Liquidambar
No picture of Liquidambar was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Liquidambar itself, so it was not used. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Liquidambar, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Also called
- sweetgumPBDB
- Sits inside
- HamamelidaceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae
Time the record covers
At least 92 million years on record.
The record covers at least 93.9 Mya to 1.4 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 100.5 Mya to 11.7 ka.
168 occurrences of Liquidambar on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
168 occurrences- Late Cretaceous2%
- Paleocene2%
- Eocene21%
- Oligocene12%
- Miocene51%
- Pliocene8%
- Pleistocene4%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
37 formations
- Sagavanirktok Formation14
- Itahana Formation · Tomioka Group7
- San Sebastian Formation · Rio Guatemala Group4
- Calvert Formation · Chesapeake Group4
- Yagii Formation2
- Yadagawa Formation2
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Liquidambar has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 13 further formations hold fewer occurrences each and are not listed. 101 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Liquidambar and its relatives
MioceneWhere Liquidambar and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
1,138 taxa- Carya50 sites
- Quercus39 sites
- Alnus37 sites
- Pinus37 sites
- Pterocarya32 sites
- Nyssa30 sites
- Acer29 sites
- Salix28 sites
- Betula27 sites
- Ilex25 sites
- Juglans25 sites
- Picea25 sites
- Tilia23 sites
- Poaceae22 sites
- Castanea20 sites
- Ulmus20 sites
- Corylus19 sites
- Ericaceae19 sites
- Fagus17 sites
- Asteraceae16 sites
- Engelhardia16 sites
- Myrica16 sites
- Triatriopollenites16 sites
- Tsuga16 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 105 sites for Liquidambar, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
45 references- Die mittelmiozaenen und obermiozaenen Floren aus der Meuroer und Raunoer Folge in der Lausitz. III. Fundstellen und Palaeobiologie29
- Late Miocene and Pliocene Floras in Central Honshu, Japan16
- Miocene floras in the lower Rhenish basin and their ecological interpretation8
- Stratigraphic, Paleoclimatic, and Paleobiogeographic Significance of Tertiary Sporomorphs from Massachusetts8
- Die Floren des Haselbacher Serie im Weisselster-Becken (Bezirk Leipzig, DDR)8
- A Middle Eocene Flora from the Central Sierra Nevada8
- Palynomorph biostratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous to Eocene samples from the Sagavanirktok Formation in its type region, North Slope of Alaska7
- Paleoecological and Floristic Heterogeneity in the Plant-Fossil Record - An Analysis Based on the Eocene of Washington7
- Palynomorph biostratigraphy of Eocene samples from the Sagavanirktok Formation at Franklin Bluffs, North Slope of Alaska7
- Niche evolution versus niche conservatism and habitat loss determine persistence and extirpation in late Neogene European Fagaceae5
- Geology and biostratigraphy of the Potomac River Cliffs at Stratford Hall, Westmoreland County, Virginia5
- Stratigraphy of the Maikop Group and Pteropoda Beds in Northern Azerbaijan4
Each of the 168 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 33 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
3D model
- Source
- Sketchfab
- Licence
- CC0 Public Domain
- Commercial use
- the licence allows it
No picture of Liquidambar was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Liquidambar itself, so it was not used.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Liquidambar, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itHamamelidaceae through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Linnaeus 1753