Trapezidae
Searched as Trapeziidae. The Paleobiology Database treats Trapezidae as the accepted name.
No picture of Trapezidae was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikipedia and Wikidata have a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Trapezidae itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Trapezidae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ArcticoideaPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Venerida
- Life habit
- infaunalPBDB, for Venerida
- Motility
- facultatively mobilePBDB, for Venerida
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Bivalvia
Time the record covers
At least 264 million years on record.
The record covers at least 264.28 Mya to 11.7 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 266.9 Mya to 0 Mya.
142 occurrences of Trapezidae on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
142 occurrences- Permianunder 1%
- Early Triassicunder 1%
- Middle Triassic2%
- Late Triassic1%
- Early Jurassic4%
- Early Cretaceous5%
- Late Cretaceous4%
- Paleocene5%
- Eocene23%
- Oligocene2%
- Miocene33%
- Pliocene4%
- Pleistocene14%
- Holocene1%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
55 formations
- Kunugidaira Formation6
- Tainohata Formation · Kobe Group6
- Matilija Formation5
- opoka Formation3
- Waimanalo Formation3
- Carbonera Formation2
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Trapezidae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 31 further formations hold fewer occurrences each and are not listed. 61 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Trapezidae and its relatives
MioceneWhere Trapezidae and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
2,909 taxa- Coralliophaga31 sites
- Ostrea19 sites
- Chlamys18 sites
- Modiolus17 sites
- Cardita16 sites
- Lithophaga lithophaga15 sites
- Chama gryphoides14 sites
- Gastrochaena14 sites
- Trapezium14 sites
- Arca noae13 sites
- Lima lima13 sites
- Barbatia (Barbatia) barbata12 sites
- Spondylus12 sites
- Cerithium11 sites
- Conus11 sites
- Glycymeris11 sites
- Hiatella arctica11 sites
- Talochlamys multistriata11 sites
- Acar10 sites
- Ctena decussata10 sites
- Plicatula10 sites
- Striarca10 sites
- Tellina10 sites
- Turritella10 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 86 sites for Trapezidae, and this reads all of them. Of that, one read hit the database's own return limit, so every count below is a floor rather than a total. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
78 references- Yanakevich, 197715
- Eocene Mollusca from the Tainohata Formation in Kobe City, southwest Japan6
- Plant and molluscan fossil assemblages rom the Lower Miocene Kunugidaira Formation in the southern part of the Joban coal-field6
- Middle Eocene brackish-marine mollusks from the Matilija Sandstone at Matilija Hot Springs, Ventura County, Southern California5
- Maastrichtian non-cephalopod mollusks: Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and Bivalvia of the Middle Vistula Valley, central Poland5
- Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene mollusca of the southern and eastern United States. Part 1. Pelecypoda, Amphineura, Pteropoda, Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda5
- New Eocene Species of Coralliophaga (Bivalvia) from Ukraine4
- Middle Miocene bivalve faunas from the carbonate deposits of Poland (Central Paratethys)4
- I crostacei associati a coralli nell’Eocene inferiore dell’area di Bolca (Verona e Vicenza, Italia nordorientale)3
- Bivalve Molluscs from the Badenian of Northwestern Bulgaria3
- Fossil mollusks of Oahu, Hawaii Islands3
- Paléontologie de l’étage inférieur de la Formation Liasique de la Province de Luxembourg (Grand-Duché) et de Hettange, Département de la Moselle [Paleontology of the lower stage of the Liassic Formation of the Province of Luxembourg (Grand Duchy) and Hettange, Moselle Department]3
Each of the 142 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 66 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Trapezidae was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Wikidata have a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Trapezidae itself, so it was not used.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Trapezidae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Trapezidae was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itArcticoidea through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Lamy 1920