Ginko cf. huttonii

No picture of Ginko cf. huttonii was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Ginko cf. huttonii firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 49 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 149.2 Mya and 100.5 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Late Jurassic — about 0 of 3 occurrencesLate JurassicEarly Cretaceous — about 3 of 3 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 0 of 3 occurrences150–148 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences148–147 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences147–145 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences145–143 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences143–142 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences142–140 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences140–138 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences138–137 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences137–135 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences135–133 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences133–132 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences132–130 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences130–128 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences128–127 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences127–125 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences125–123 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences123–121 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences121–120 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences120–118 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences118–116 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences116–115 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences115–113 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences113–111 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences111–110 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences110–108 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences108–106 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences106–105 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences105–103 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences103–101 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences101–100 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences150 Mya100 Mya

3 occurrences of Ginko cf. huttonii on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Currier — 49.70°N, 126.62°WMcEvoy — 49.70°N, 126.62°WDevils Claw — 49.70°N, 126.62°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ginko cf. huttonii has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Ginko cf. huttonii and its relatives

Early Cretaceous

Where Ginko cf. huttonii and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

43 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Ginko cf. huttonii, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Credit
MGRRE
Licence
CC Attribution
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record

No picture of Ginko cf. huttonii was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Ginko cf. huttonii firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.