Opephora
No picture of Opephora was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Opephora, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- FragilariaceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Bacillariophyceae
- Environment
- marine,brackish,freshwaterPBDB, for Bacillariophyceae
Time the record covers
At least 2.5 million years on record.
The record covers at least 2.58 Mya to 11.7 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 5.333 Mya to 0 Mya.
5 occurrences of Opephora on record. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrences- Pliocene33%
- Pleistocene27%
- Holocene40%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Opephora has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 4 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Found in the same rock
74 taxa- Acrocheilus2 sites
- Anas2 sites
- Anomoeonemis costata2 sites
- Chaetoceros2 sites
- Chasmistes2 sites
- Cocconeis2 sites
- Cyclotella2 sites
- Diploneis2 sites
- Melosira2 sites
- Navicula sp.2 sites
- Oncorhynchus2 sites
- Pinnularia2 sites
- Actinocyclus1 site
- Actoncyclus octonarius1 site
- Ammonia1 site
- Amphora1 site
- Asteromphalus1 site
- Bacterosira1 site
- Brebissonia sp.1 site
- Campylodiscus1 site
- Candona1 site
- Catostomus1 site
- Coscinodiscus1 site
- Coscinodiscus marginatus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Opephora, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Regressions and transgressions of the Baltic Basin reflected by a new high-resolution deglacial and postglacial lithostratigraphy for Arkona Basin sediments (western Baltic Sea)2
- Biogeography of the Pliocene and Pleistocene vertebrate faunas of Northeastern California and their temporal significance to the development of the Modoc Plateau and Klamath Mountain Region2
- Site U13421
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Opephora was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Opephora, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Opephora was found in Smithsonian Open Access and Sketchfab.
MorphoSource was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFragilariaceae through timeThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Petit 1888