Zamites
No picture of Zamites was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Zamites itself, so it was not used. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Zamites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- BennettitalesPBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Streptophyta
Time the record covers
At least 193 million years on record.
The record covers at least 241.464 Mya to 48.07 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 251.902 Mya to 37.71 Mya.
386 occurrences of Zamites on record, most of them in the Late Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
386 occurrences- Early Triassicunder 1%
- Middle Triassic4%
- Late Triassic37%
- Early Jurassic11%
- Middle Jurassic15%
- Late Jurassic22%
- Early Cretaceous8%
- Late Cretaceousunder 1%
- Eocene2%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
75 formations
- Santa Clara Formation · Barranca Group107
- Steierdorf Formation13
- Zorrillo Formation · Tecocoyunco Group9
- Rosario Formation8
- Chinle Formation7
- Oginohama Formation7
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Zamites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 51 further formations hold fewer occurrences each and are not listed. 117 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Zamites and its relatives
Late TriassicWhere Zamites and its relatives were recorded in the Late Triassic.
Found in the same rock
933 taxa- Brachyphyllum71 sites
- Cladophlebis71 sites
- Nilsonia69 sites
- Pterophyllum66 sites
- Otozamites61 sites
- Pagiophyllum52 sites
- Sphenopteris46 sites
- Podozamites43 sites
- Equisetites41 sites
- Coniopteris40 sites
- Taeniopteris40 sites
- Ptilophyllum39 sites
- Sagenopteris36 sites
- Todites35 sites
- Baiera34 sites
- Elatocladus31 sites
- Phlebopteris30 sites
- Anomozamites29 sites
- Czekanowskia29 sites
- Williamsonia28 sites
- Neocalamites26 sites
- Pseudoctenis25 sites
- Dictyophyllum24 sites
- Ginkgo23 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 192 sites for Zamites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
96 references- Nuevo ensayo de un panorama de la paleoecologia de comunidades de la tafoflora Santa Clara (Triasico Tardio, Sonora)80
- La paleoflore Jurassique du Jura Francais: Etude systematique, aspects stratigraphiques et paleoecologiques47
- Hipotesis de trabajo acerca de la paleoecologia de comunidades de la tafoflora Santa Clara del Triasico Tardio de Sonora25
- Early Jurassic land flora of the Getic Nappe23
- Paleobotanica del Jurasico de Mexico16
- Anderson and Anderson, 198514
- Recent knowledge of Jurassic and Early Cretaceous Floras in Japan and Phytogeography of this Time in East Asia11
- The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora V. Coniferales10
- A Middle Eocene Flora from the Central Sierra Nevada9
- Triassic Floras of Eurasia8
- Late Jurassic Plants from the Oginohama Formation, Oshika Group in the Outer Zone of Northeast Japan (I)7
- The Stratigraphic Tables of Sichuan6
Each of the 386 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 84 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Zamites was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Zamites itself, so it was not used.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Zamites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Zamites was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itBennettitales through timeFormations of the Late TriassicThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Brongniart 1828)