Rostellites
No picture of Rostellites was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Rostellites firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 21 million years on record.
The record covers at least 93.9 Mya to 72.2 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 100.5 Mya to 66 Mya.
7 occurrences of Rostellites on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
7 occurrences- Late Cretaceous100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
6 formations
- Merchantville Formation2
- Peedee Formation1
- Mancos Shale Formation1
- Marias River Shale Formation1
- Colorado Formation1
- Chico Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Rostellites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Rostellites and its relatives
Late CretaceousWhere Rostellites and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
139 taxa- Anchura2 sites
- Anomia argentaria2 sites
- Crassatella2 sites
- Cucullaea2 sites
- Cyprimeria2 sites
- Exogyra2 sites
- Gyrodes2 sites
- Inoceramus2 sites
- Pycnodonte2 sites
- Reptilia2 sites
- Turritella2 sites
- Veniella conradi2 sites
- Acirsa nexilia1 site
- Ammonitida1 site
- Anatimya anteradiata1 site
- Anomoeodus phaseolus1 site
- Aphrodina1 site
- Aphroina sp.1 site
- Astarte tuscana1 site
- Astrangia cretacea1 site
- Baculites asper1 site
- Baculites chicoensis1 site
- Baculites codyensis1 site
- Baculites haresi1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Rostellites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
7 references- Paleontology and stratigraphy of upper Coniacian–middle Santonian ammonite zones and application to erosion surfaces and marine transgressive strata in Montana and Alberta1
- Upper Cretaceous macroinvertebrate faunas of the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain1
- Upper Cretaceous rocks and ammonite faunas of southwestern New Mexico1
- Paleoecology of the Delaware Valley region. Part II: Cretaceous to Quartenary1
- Stratigraphy and revision of nomenclature of upper Cenomanian to Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) rocks of west-central New Mexico1
- The Cretaceous formations1
- The Rocks of the Sierra Nevada1
Each of the 7 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Rostellites was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Rostellites firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Rostellites was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the Late CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Conrad 1855