Remopleuridae

No picture of Remopleuridae was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Remopleuridae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AsaphidaPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Trilobita
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Asaphida
Motility
fast-movingPBDB, for Asaphida
Environment
marinePBDB, for Trilobita

Time the record covers

At least 34 million years on record.

The record covers at least 491 Mya to 456.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 494.2 Mya to 449.6 Mya.

Cambrian — about 5 of 18 occurrencesCambrianOrdovician — about 13 of 18 occurrencesOrdovician495–494 Mya — about 1 occurrence494–492 Mya — about 2 occurrences492–490 Mya — about 2 occurrences472–470 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences470–469 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences469–467 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences467–466 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences466–464 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences464–463 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences463–461 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences461–460 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences460–458 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences458–456 Mya — about 3 occurrences456–455 Mya — about 4 occurrences455–453 Mya — about 4 occurrences453–452 Mya — about 1 occurrence452–450 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences450–449 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences491 Mya456.6 Mya495.1 Mya448.7 Mya

18 occurrences of Remopleuridae on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

18 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

5 formations

Balclatchie — 55.22°N, 4.85°WBalclatchie — 55.17°N, 4.87°WBalclatchie — 55.31°N, 4.80°WChatsworth Limestone — 22.53°S, 140.28°EArdwell Farm — 55.25°N, 4.85°WArdwell Farm — 55.22°N, 4.77°WEdinburg — 38.99°N, 78.35°WEdinburg — 38.98°N, 78.37°WValhallfonna — 79.80°N, 17.76°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Remopleuridae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Remopleuridae and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Remopleuridae and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

177 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 16 sites for Remopleuridae, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

5 references

Each of the 18 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

CT scan

Licence
not stated by the source
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record
Specimen
Remopleuridae indet. · L-JH:Eb18 06 C3

No picture of Remopleuridae was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Remopleuridae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hawle and Corda 1847