Dielasma virgoides

No picture of Dielasma virgoides was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Dielasma virgoides, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
DielasmaPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Terebratulida
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Terebratulida
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Terebratulida
Vision
blindPBDB, for Rhynchonellata
Environment
marinePBDB, for Lophophorata

Time the record covers

At least 73 million years on record.

The record covers at least 339.9 Mya to 266.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 358.86 Mya to 264.28 Mya.

Devonian — about 0 of 16 occurrencesCarboniferous — about 14 of 16 occurrencesCarboniferousPermian — about 2 of 16 occurrencesPermian361–357 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences357–354 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences354–351 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences351–348 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences348–344 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences344–341 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences341–338 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences338–335 Mya — about 2 occurrences335–331 Mya — about 5 occurrences331–328 Mya — about 2 occurrences328–325 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences325–321 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences269–266 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences266–262 Mya — about 1 occurrence339.9 Mya266.9 Mya361 Mya262 Mya

16 occurrences of Dielasma virgoides on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

16 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

13 formations

Hawes Limestone I — 54.30°N, 2.15°WFeltrim — 53.43°N, 6.20°WLower Limestone — 55.81°N, 4.54°WGayle Limestone II — 54.30°N, 2.15°WHardrow Scar Limestone III — 54.30°N, 2.15°WSimonstone Limestone IVa Cyclothem — 54.30°N, 2.15°WSimonstone Limestone IVb — 54.30°N, 2.15°WMiddle Limestone V — 54.30°N, 2.15°WUnderset Limestone VIII — 54.30°N, 2.15°WMain Limestone IX — 54.30°N, 2.15°WGerringong — 34.42°S, 150.91°EMuree — 32.76°S, 151.75°EBaird — 40.79°N, 122.30°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Dielasma virgoides has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Dielasma virgoides and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Dielasma virgoides and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

288 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 15 sites for Dielasma virgoides, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

5 references

Each of the 16 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Dielasma virgoides was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Dielasma virgoides, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Dielasma virgoides was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (M'Coy 1844)