Spores indet.
No picture of Spores indet. was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Spores indet. itself, so it was not used. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Spores indet. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 382 million years on record.
The record covers at least 382.31 Mya to 11.7 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 387.95 Mya to 0 Mya.
223 occurrences of Spores indet. on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
223 occurrences- Devonianunder 1%
- Late Cretaceous2%
- Eocene7%
- Oligocene25%
- Miocene39%
- Pliocene14%
- Pleistocene11%
- Holocene1%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
- Kiskatom Formation · Hamilton Group1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Spores indet. has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 222 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Spores indet. and its relatives
MioceneWhere Spores indet. and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
71 taxa- <Spores>218 sites
- <Saccate pollen>217 sites
- <Fungal spores>215 sites
- <Other pollen>214 sites
- Nothofagus214 sites
- Foraminifera91 sites
- <Amorphous organic matter>88 sites
- <Black phytoclasts>88 sites
- <Brown phytoclasts>88 sites
- <Pollen/spores reworked>88 sites
- <Sporomorphs>88 sites
- Acritarcha88 sites
- Dinoflagellata88 sites
- Prasinophytae88 sites
- Brigantedinium47 sites
- Leiosphaeridia42 sites
- Cymatiosphaera35 sites
- Lejeunecysta31 sites
- Selenopemphix24 sites
- Operculodinium19 sites
- Protoperidinium18 sites
- Batiacasphaera16 sites
- Selenopemphix nephroides16 sites
- Vozzhennikovia14 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 223 sites for Spores indet., and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
14 references- Site U135693
- Site U152129
- Site U152221
- Site U152417
- Site U152314
- Site U135913
- Site U136110
- Site U15257
- Site U13555
- Site U13605
- An upper Senonian pollen assemblage of borehole 3-Pia-10-Al state of Alagoas, Brazil4
- Site U13573
Each of the 223 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 2 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
3D model
- Source
- Sketchfab
- Credit
- Tycho Magnetic Anomaly
- Licence
- CC Attribution
- Commercial use
- cannot be read from the licence given — check the record
No picture of Spores indet. was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.
Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Spores indet. itself, so it was not used.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Spores indet. firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.