Retamaspis
No picture of Retamaspis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Retamaspis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ZeliszkellinaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Phacopina
- Life habit
- low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Trilobita
- Motility
- fast-movingPBDB, for Trilobita
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Dalmanitidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Trilobita
Time the record covers
At most 29 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 486.85 Mya and 458.2 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
7 occurrences of Retamaspis on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
7 occurrences- Ordovician100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
6 formations
- Navas de Estena Formation1
- Valongo Formation1
- Arroyo del Acebron Shales Formation1
- Traveusot Formation1
- Rio Schiefer Formation1
- Rio-Schiefer Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Retamaspis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Retamaspis and its relatives
OrdovicianWhere Retamaspis and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.
Found in the same rock
116 taxa- Bathycheilus4 sites
- Geragnostus4 sites
- Asaphellus3 sites
- Colpocoryphe3 sites
- Ectillaenus3 sites
- Hungioides3 sites
- Nobiliasaphus3 sites
- Placoparia (Placoparia) cambriensis3 sites
- Uralichas3 sites
- Didymograptellus bifidus2 sites
- Didymograptus2 sites
- Isabelinia2 sites
- Neseuretus2 sites
- Ogyginus2 sites
- Placoparia2 sites
- Pterygometopus2 sites
- Redonia2 sites
- Salterocoryphe2 sites
- <Genus T1, Aristocystitid echinoderm>1 site
- <Genus T2, Diploporitid echinoderm>1 site
- Acrograptus1 site
- Actinopeltis1 site
- Amplexograptus1 site
- Ananterodonta1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 7 sites for Retamaspis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- Phacopina und Cheirurina (Trilobita) aus dem Ordovizium von Spanien2
- Trilobites del Ordovicico de la zona centroiberica (sector entre los Montes de Toledo y Sierra Morena)1
- Precisiones sobre los trilobites del arroyo del Acebron, Ventas con Pena Aguilera, Toledo1
- Estudio bioestratigrafico del Llanvirn y Llandeilo (Dobrotiviense) en la parte meridional de la zona Centroiberica (España)1
- The trilobite genus Eoharpes from the Ordovician of Brittany and Portugal1
- Trilobites ordoviciens du Massif armoricain1
Each of the 7 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Retamaspis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Retamaspis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Retamaspis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itZeliszkellinae through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hammann 1972