Remopleurides latus

No picture of Remopleurides latus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Remopleurides latus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RemopleuridesPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Trilobita
Life habit
nektobenthicPBDB, for Remopleurides
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Remopleurides
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Remopleurididae
Environment
marinePBDB, for Trilobita

Time the record covers

At least 7.7 million years on record.

The record covers at least 458.2 Mya to 450.5 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 469.4 Mya to 443.1 Mya.

Ordovician — about 9 of 9 occurrencesOrdovicianSilurian — about 0 of 9 occurrences470–469 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences469–468 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences468–467 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences467–466 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences466–465 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences465–464 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences464–464 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences464–463 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences463–462 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences462–461 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences461–460 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences460–459 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences459–458 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences458–457 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences457–456 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences456–455 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences455–454 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences454–454 Mya — about 1 occurrence454–453 Mya — about 1 occurrence453–452 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences452–451 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences451–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–449 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences449–448 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences448–447 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences447–446 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences446–445 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences445–444 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences444–443 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences443–443 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences458.2 Mya450.5 Mya469.9 Mya442.6 Mya

9 occurrences of Remopleurides latus on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

9 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

6 formations

Acton Scott — 52.00°N, 2.00°WDalby — 58.00°N, 12.00°EKullsberg — 60.92°N, 15.10°ESchroeteri Limestone — 63.12°N, 14.68°EChasmops Limestone — 63.17°N, 14.08°EShihtien — 25.00°N, 99.06°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Remopleurides latus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 3 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Remopleurides latus and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Remopleurides latus and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

132 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 9 sites for Remopleurides latus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

6 references

Each of the 9 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Remopleurides latus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Remopleurides latus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Remopleurides latus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itRemopleurides through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Olin 1906