Protoscolex
No picture of Protoscolex was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Protoscolex, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- PalaeoscolecidaPBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Priapulida
- Life habit
- shallow infaunalPBDB, for Priapulida
- Motility
- facultatively mobilePBDB, for Priapulida
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Palaeoscolecida
Time the record covers
At least 60 million years on record.
The record covers at least 486.85 Mya to 426.7 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 497 Mya to 422.7 Mya.
8 occurrences of Protoscolex on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
8 occurrences- Cambrian13%
- Ordovician50%
- Silurian38%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
7 formations
- Kope Formation2
- Utica Shale Formation1
- Chopko Formation1
- Whitby Formation · Nottawasaga Group1
- Mosalem Formation1
- Racine Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Protoscolex has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Protoscolex and its relatives
OrdovicianWhere Protoscolex and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.
Found in the same rock
171 taxa- Climacograptus4 sites
- Orbiculoidea4 sites
- Arthrostylus3 sites
- Aspidopora3 sites
- Craniops3 sites
- Cryptolithus3 sites
- Lecathylus3 sites
- Mastigograptus3 sites
- Nuculites3 sites
- Serpulites3 sites
- Trematis3 sites
- Ambonychia2 sites
- Amplexopora2 sites
- Aparchites2 sites
- Arthropoma2 sites
- Batostoma2 sites
- Bythopora2 sites
- Ceramoporella2 sites
- Ceratiocarida indet.2 sites
- Ceratocephala2 sites
- Coeloclema2 sites
- Cornulites2 sites
- Corynotrypa2 sites
- Crepipora2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Protoscolex, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- Caradocian-Gedinnian echinoderm associations of Central and Eastern North America2
- The fossil fauna of the Ordovician in the Cincinnati Region2
- Soft-bodied Cambrian organisms of the Siberian Platform1
- The Medusaegraptus epibole and Lower Ludlovian Konservat-Lagerstätten of eastern North America1
- Beecher’s Trilobite Bed revisited; ecology of an Ordovician deepwater fauna1
- Palaeozoic geology of the Lake Simcoe Area, Ontario1
Each of the 8 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Protoscolex was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Protoscolex, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Protoscolex was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itPalaeoscolecida through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.