Crassovella raricostata
No picture of Crassovella raricostata was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Crassovella raricostata, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CrassovellaPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Crassatellidae
- Life habit
- infaunalPBDB, for Crassovella
- Motility
- facultatively mobilePBDB, for Crassatellidae
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Crassatelloidea
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Crassovella
Time the record covers
At most 7.2 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 41.03 Mya and 33.9 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
3 occurrences of Crassovella raricostata on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
3 occurrences- Eocene100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Crassovella raricostata has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Crassovella raricostata and its relatives
EoceneWhere Crassovella raricostata and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
61 taxa- Crassatina (Chattonia) expolita2 sites
- Acropora solanderi1 site
- Actinacis martiniana1 site
- Argyrotheca lunula1 site
- Argyrotheca megapora1 site
- Astreopora sphaeroidalis1 site
- Balanophyllia1 site
- Bronnothyris danaperensis1 site
- Chlamys1 site
- Chlamys carinata1 site
- Cidaris1 site
- Colpophyllia slavutytschensis1 site
- Corbula1 site
- Crassatella (Crassatella) duplex1 site
- Crassatella (Crassatella) necopina1 site
- Crassatella (Crassatella) oblongula1 site
- Crassatella (Furvusa)1 site
- Crassatella (Furvusa) singulata1 site
- Crassatella desmaresti1 site
- Crassatina (Chattonia)1 site
- Crassatina (Crassatina)1 site
- Crassatina (Crassatina) bronnii1 site
- Crassostrea (Cymbulostrea) cymbula1 site
- Crassovella faber1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Crassovella raricostata, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
2 references- Upper Eocene Bivalves from Dnepr, Ukraine: Crassatellidae2
- Upper Eocene foraminifera of East Poland and their paleogeographical meaning1
Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Crassovella raricostata was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Crassovella raricostata, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Crassovella raricostata was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCrassovella through timeFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Klushnikov 1958)