Caesalpinioideae

Caesalpinioideae

Hans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikidata/Commons. May be a photograph of a specimen, or an artist’s reconstruction — an interpretation of a skeleton, since colour and soft tissue are almost never preserved.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
FabaceaePBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae

Time the record covers

At least 42 million years on record.

The record covers at least 48.07 Mya to 5.333 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 56 Mya to 2.58 Mya.

Paleocene — about 0 of 39 occurrencesEocene — about 11 of 39 occurrencesEoceneOligocene — about 0 of 39 occurrencesMiocene — about 26 of 39 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 2 of 39 occurrencesPleistocene — about 0 of 39 occurrences57–55 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences55–53 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences53–52 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences52–50 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences50–48 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences48–46 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences46–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–40 Mya — about 2 occurrences40–39 Mya — about 4 occurrences39–37 Mya — about 2 occurrences24–22 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences22–20 Mya — about 1 occurrence20–18 Mya — about 1 occurrence18–16 Mya — about 1 occurrence16–14 Mya — about 5 occurrences14–13 Mya — about 4 occurrences13–11 Mya — about 3 occurrences11–8.9 Mya — about 3 occurrences8.9–7.1 Mya — about 3 occurrences7.1–5.2 Mya — about 3 occurrences5.2–3.4 Mya — about 2 occurrences3.4–1.5 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences48.07 Mya5.333 Mya57 Mya2 Mya

39 occurrences of Caesalpinioideae on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

39 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

17 formations

Pondaung — 21.62°N, 94.85°EPondaung — 21.77°N, 94.85°EPondaung — 21.73°N, 94.72°EPondaung — 21.67°N, 94.82°ELower — 29.49°N, 78.76°ELower — 31.01°N, 76.73°ETipam — 25.77°N, 93.39°ETipam — 27.19°N, 95.47°ETipam — 24.68°N, 92.56°EXiaolongtan — 23.81°N, 103.20°EDongxianguan — 32.10°N, 118.70°EDongxianguan — 32.08°N, 118.75°EXiananshan — 29.15°N, 121.23°ELondon Clay — 51.40°N, 0.83°EAkeyo — 35.37°N, 137.18°EXiacaowan — 33.50°N, 118.33°EShanwang — 36.55°N, 118.71°EYousashan — 34.80°N, 91.00°ELiuhe — 32.08°N, 118.75°EYuhuatai — 32.08°N, 118.75°EHuazhige — 23.02°N, 104.38°EChangchang — 19.63°N, 110.45°EYouganwo — 21.70°N, 110.88°EWarkalli — 8.74°N, 76.70°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Caesalpinioideae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 8 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Caesalpinioideae and its relatives

Miocene

Where Caesalpinioideae and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.

Found in the same rock

350 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 32 sites for Caesalpinioideae, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

10 references

Each of the 39 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

Picture of Caesalpinioideae

Credit
Hans Hillewaert
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0
Commercial use
the licence allows it

No 3D scan of Caesalpinioideae was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.