Verihachyum irregulare

No picture of Verihachyum irregulare was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Verihachyum irregulare firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At least 2.2 million years on record.

The record covers at least 250.8 Mya to 248.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 251.902 Mya to 247 Mya.

Permian — about 0 of 3 occurrencesEarly Triassic — about 3 of 3 occurrencesEarly TriassicMiddle Triassic — about 0 of 3 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences252–252 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences252–251 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences249–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–248 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences248–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences247–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences247–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences247–247 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences250.8 Mya248.6 Mya252.4 Mya246.5 Mya

3 occurrences of Verihachyum irregulare on record, most of them in the Early Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Köveskal Dolomite — 46.88°N, 17.61°ECsopak Marl — 46.88°N, 17.61°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Verihachyum irregulare has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Verihachyum irregulare and its relatives

Early Triassic

Where Verihachyum irregulare and its relatives were recorded in the Early Triassic.

Found in the same rock

10 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Verihachyum irregulare, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Verihachyum irregulare was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Verihachyum irregulare firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Verihachyum irregulare was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itFormations of the Early TriassicThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.