Ungdarella uralica

No picture of Ungdarella uralica was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ungdarella uralica, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
UngdarellaPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Rhodophyceae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Rhodophyceae
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Rhodophyceae
Environment
coastal,inner shelf,marinePBDB, for Rhodophyceae

Time the record covers

At least 71 million years on record.

The record covers at least 335.9 Mya to 264.28 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 346.7 Mya to 259.857 Mya.

Carboniferous — about 6 of 12 occurrencesCarboniferousPermian — about 6 of 12 occurrencesPermian348–345 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences345–342 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences342–339 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences339–336 Mya — about 1 occurrence336–333 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences333–330 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences330–327 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences327–324 Mya — about 1 occurrence324–321 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences300–297 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences297–294 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences294–291 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences291–288 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences288–285 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences285–282 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences282–279 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences279–276 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences276–273 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences273–270 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences270–267 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences267–264 Mya — about 2 occurrences264–261 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences261–258 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences335.9 Mya264.28 Mya348 Mya258 Mya

12 occurrences of Ungdarella uralica on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

12 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Ardengost — 42.93°N, 0.40°EBricklieve Limestone — 54.05°N, 8.37°WSangalt — 39.37°N, 67.58°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ungdarella uralica has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 9 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Ungdarella uralica and its relatives

Carboniferous

Where Ungdarella uralica and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.

Found in the same rock

139 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 7 sites for Ungdarella uralica, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

12 references

Each of the 12 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ungdarella uralica was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ungdarella uralica, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Ungdarella uralica was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Maslov 1956