Torrowangea rosei

No picture of Torrowangea rosei was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Torrowangea rosei firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
TorrowangeaPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 17 million years on record.

The record covers at least 538.8 Mya to 521 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 635 Mya to 516 Mya.

Cambrian — about 1 of 6 occurrencesCambrian637–633 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences633–629 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences629–625 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences625–621 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences621–617 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences617–613 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences613–609 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences609–604 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences604–600 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences600–596 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences596–592 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences592–588 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences588–584 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences584–580 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences580–576 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences576–571 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences571–567 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences567–563 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences563–559 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences559–555 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences555–551 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences551–547 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences547–542 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences542–538 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences522–518 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences518–514 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences538.8 Mya521 Mya637 Mya514 Mya

6 occurrences of Torrowangea rosei on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

6 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Blueflower — 64.67°N, 132.00°WBlueflower — 63.39°N, 128.48°WPedroche — 37.95°N, 4.77°WEstenilla — 39.67°N, 5.03°WCíjara — 39.67°N, 5.03°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Torrowangea rosei has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Torrowangea rosei and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Torrowangea rosei and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

22 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Torrowangea rosei, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

4 references

Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Licence
CC Attribution
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record

No picture of Torrowangea rosei was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Torrowangea rosei firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Webby 1970