Ptychonema bussacensis

No picture of Ptychonema bussacensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ptychonema bussacensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
PtychonemaPBDB
Diet
detritivorePBDB, for Eotomarioidea
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Eotomarioidea
Motility
slow-movingPBDB, for Eotomarioidea
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Eotomarioidea
Environment
coastal,marinePBDB, for Murchisoniina

Time the record covers

At least 9.6 million years on record.

The record covers at least 459.7 Mya to 450.1 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 461 Mya to 445.2 Mya.

Ordovician — about 3 of 3 occurrencesOrdovician462–461 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences461–460 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences460–460 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences460–459 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences450–449 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences449–449 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences449–448 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences448–448 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences448–447 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences447–446 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences446–446 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences446–445 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences445–445 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences459.7 Mya450.1 Mya461.5 Mya444.7 Mya

3 occurrences of Ptychonema bussacensis on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Villar del Salz — 40.93°N, 2.05°WPorto de Santa Anna — 40.38°N, 8.37°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ptychonema bussacensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Ptychonema bussacensis and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Ptychonema bussacensis and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

38 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Ptychonema bussacensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ptychonema bussacensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ptychonema bussacensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Ptychonema bussacensis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itPtychonema through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Sharpe 1853)