Prosopis
No picture of Prosopis was found. iDigBio was searched and had none. Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Prosopis itself, so it was not used. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Prosopis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Also called
- mesquitePBDB
- Sits inside
- MimosaceaePBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae
Time the record covers
At least 33 million years on record.
The record covers at least 33.9 Mya to 11.7 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 37 Mya to 0 Mya.
11 occurrences of Prosopis on record, most of them in the Pleistocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
11 occurrences- Eocene9%
- Miocene27%
- Pliocene18%
- Pleistocene36%
- Holocene9%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
- San José Formation · Santa María Group2
- Andalhuala Formation · Santa María Group1
- Bopesta Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Prosopis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 7 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Prosopis and its relatives
PleistoceneWhere Prosopis and its relatives were recorded in the Pleistocene.
Found in the same rock
324 taxa- Cyperaceae5 sites
- Ephedra5 sites
- Poaceae5 sites
- Apiaceae4 sites
- Artemisia4 sites
- Asteraceae4 sites
- Bombax4 sites
- Capparis4 sites
- Cerealia4 sites
- Dodonaea4 sites
- Euphorbia4 sites
- Grewia4 sites
- Maytenus4 sites
- Syzygium4 sites
- Tamarix4 sites
- Typha angustata4 sites
- Aerva3 sites
- Ailanthus3 sites
- Azadirachta indica3 sites
- Calligonum3 sites
- Cleome3 sites
- Corchorus3 sites
- Fabaceae3 sites
- Indigofera3 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Prosopis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- A Catalogue of Fossil Plants from India Part 6: Cenozoic (Quaternary) Palynology and Palaeobotany5
- Megaflora (hojas y frutos) de la Formación San José (Mioceno Medio) en río Seco, departamento Santa María, provincia de Catamarca, Argentina2
- Paleoflora (Fabaceae y Anacardiaceae) de la Formación Andalhuala (Plioceno Inferior), provincia de Catamarca, Argentina1
- Fossil Plants of the Florissant Beds of Colorado1
- A Miocene flora from the western border of the Mohave desert1
- Tercera noticia sobre los vertebrados fosiles de las Arenas Puelchenses de Villa Ballester1
Each of the 11 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
3D model
- Source
- Sketchfab
- Credit
- openseedspace
- Licence
- CC Attribution
- Commercial use
- cannot be read from the licence given — check the record
No picture of Prosopis was found. iDigBio was searched and had none.
Wikidata has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Prosopis itself, so it was not used.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Prosopis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itMimosaceae through timeFormations of the PleistoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Linnaeus 1767