Populus nebrascensis

No picture of Populus nebrascensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Populus nebrascensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
PopulusPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Angiospermae

Time the record covers

At least 2.6 million years on record.

The record covers at least 66 Mya to 63.4 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 72.2 Mya to 60.9 Mya.

Late Cretaceous — about 15 of 43 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 28 of 43 occurrencesPaleocene72–72 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences72–71 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences71–71 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences71–71 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences71–70 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences70–70 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences70–69 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences69–69 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences69–69 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences69–68 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences68–68 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences68–67 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences67–67 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences67–67 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences67–66 Mya — about 1.0 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 3 occurrences66–65 Mya — about 4 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 4 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 4 occurrences65–64 Mya — about 4 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 4 occurrences64–63 Mya — about 3 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences63–62 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences62–61 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences61–61 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences66 Mya63.4 Mya72.7 Mya60.4 Mya

43 occurrences of Populus nebrascensis on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

43 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Fort Union — 46.47°N, 104.01°WFort Union — 46.51°N, 103.88°WFort Union — 46.35°N, 103.87°WFort Union — 46.02°N, 103.76°WFort Union — 46.28°N, 103.81°WFort Union — 46.32°N, 103.88°WFort Union — 46.39°N, 104.00°WFort Union — 46.34°N, 103.99°WFort Union — 46.00°N, 103.00°WFort Union — 46.43°N, 105.24°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Populus nebrascensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Populus nebrascensis and its relatives

Paleocene

Where Populus nebrascensis and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.

Found in the same rock

50 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 43 sites for Populus nebrascensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 43 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Populus nebrascensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Populus nebrascensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Populus nebrascensis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Newberry 1868