Polygnathus communis communis
No picture of Polygnathus communis communis was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Polygnathus communis communis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 14 million years on record.
The record covers at least 368.5 Mya to 353.7 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 372.15 Mya to 346.7 Mya.
21 occurrences of Polygnathus communis communis on record, most of them in the Carboniferous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
21 occurrences- Devonian33%
- Carboniferous67%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
4 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Polygnathus communis communis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Polygnathus communis communis and its relatives
CarboniferousWhere Polygnathus communis communis and its relatives were recorded in the Carboniferous.
Found in the same rock
56 taxa- Fasciculophyllum11 sites
- Gnathodus11 sites
- Caninia cornucopiae8 sites
- Hindeodus8 sites
- Pseudopolygnathus8 sites
- Spathognathodus8 sites
- Cyathoclisia6 sites
- Michelinia6 sites
- Sychnoelasma konincki konincki6 sites
- Allotropiophyllum4 sites
- Bispathodus aculeatus4 sites
- Caninophyllum patulum greeni4 sites
- Caninophyllum patulum patulum4 sites
- Neopolygnathus communis4 sites
- Syringopora4 sites
- Bispathodus stabilis3 sites
- Polygnathus semicostatus3 sites
- Palmatolepis gracilis gracilis2 sites
- Polygnathus communis dentatus2 sites
- Pseudopolygnathus primus2 sites
- Siphonodella2 sites
- Amplexus1 site
- Angulodus1 site
- Angulodus walrathi1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 21 sites for Polygnathus communis communis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
5 references- The distribution of platform conodonts, corals, and foraminifera from the Black Rock Limestone (late Tournaisian and early Visean) of Tears Point, Gower, south Wales13
- Upper Devonian (Frasnian-Famennian) conodont biostratigraphy in the subsurface of north-central Iowa and southeastern Nebraska4
- Early Famennian bryozoan fauna from the Baqer-abad section, northeast Isfahan, central Iran2
- Middle and Upper Devonian depositional settings of the Moesian Terrane (northern Bulgaria)1
- Early Lower Carboniferous Conodonts from the Syringothyris Limestone of Kashmir1
Each of the 21 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content1
3D model
- Source
- Sketchfab
- Licence
- CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
- Commercial use
- the licence does not allow it
No picture of Polygnathus communis communis was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Polygnathus communis communis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the CarboniferousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.