Nileus armadillo

No picture of Nileus armadillo was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Nileus armadillo, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
NileusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Trilobita
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Asaphida
Motility
fast-movingPBDB, for Asaphida
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Nileidae
Environment
marinePBDB, for Trilobita

Time the record covers

At least 13 million years on record.

The record covers at least 471.3 Mya to 458.2 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 486.85 Mya to 449.5 Mya.

Cambrian — about 0 of 16 occurrencesOrdovician — about 16 of 16 occurrencesOrdovician488–486 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences486–485 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences485–484 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences484–482 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences482–481 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences481–480 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences480–479 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences479–477 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences477–476 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences476–475 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences475–473 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences473–472 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences472–471 Mya — about 1 occurrence471–469 Mya — about 2 occurrences469–468 Mya — about 2 occurrences468–467 Mya — about 2 occurrences467–466 Mya — about 2 occurrences466–464 Mya — about 1 occurrence464–463 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences463–462 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences462–460 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences460–459 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences459–458 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences458–457 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences457–455 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences455–454 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences454–453 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences453–451 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences451–450 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences450–449 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences471.3 Mya458.2 Mya487.6 Mya448.8 Mya

16 occurrences of Nileus armadillo on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

16 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Holen — 57.11°N, 16.89°EHolen — 57.30°N, 16.98°EHolen — 56.62°N, 16.56°EShihtien — 25.00°N, 99.06°EDalby — 58.00°N, 12.00°EToila — 59.44°N, 27.31°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Nileus armadillo has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 9 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Nileus armadillo and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Nileus armadillo and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

65 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 16 sites for Nileus armadillo, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

7 references

Each of the 16 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Licence
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Commercial use
the licence does not allow it

No picture of Nileus armadillo was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Nileus armadillo, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Dalman 1826