Lithothamnion roveretoi

No picture of Lithothamnion roveretoi was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithothamnion roveretoi, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
LithothamnionPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Rhodophyta

Time the record covers

At least 47 million years on record.

The record covers at least 48.07 Mya to 774 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 59.24 Mya to 11.7 ka.

Paleocene — about 0 of 10 occurrencesEocene — about 4 of 10 occurrencesEoceneOligocene — about 3 of 10 occurrencesOligoceneMiocene — about 2 of 10 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 0 of 10 occurrencesPleistocene — about 1 of 10 occurrences60–58 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences58–56 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences56–54 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences54–52 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences52–50 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences50–48 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences48–46 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences46–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–40 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences40–38 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences38–36 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences36–34 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences34–32 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences32–30 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences30–28 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences28–26 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences26–24 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences24–22 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences16–14 Mya — about 1 occurrence14–12 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences12–10 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences2.0–0 Mya — about 1 occurrence48.07 Mya774 ka60 Mya0 Mya

10 occurrences of Lithothamnion roveretoi on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

10 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

7 formations

Chaya — 22.33°N, 68.95°EEl Bosque — 37.90°N, 1.57°WMolare — 44.50°N, 8.48°ELakadong — 25.16°N, 92.39°EBassein — 18.93°N, 72.48°EFulra — 23.81°N, 69.07°EBorové — 49.28°N, 19.75°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Lithothamnion roveretoi has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 3 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Lithothamnion roveretoi and its relatives

Eocene

Where Lithothamnion roveretoi and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.

Found in the same rock

12 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 4 sites for Lithothamnion roveretoi, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

10 references

Each of the 10 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Lithothamnion roveretoi was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithothamnion roveretoi, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Lithothamnion roveretoi was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Airoldi 1970