Laurentoscandodus

No picture of Laurentoscandodus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Laurentoscandodus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
DrepanoistodontidaePBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Conodonta
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Conodonta
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Conodonta
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Conodonta

Time the record covers

At most 14 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 488.9 Mya and 475.3 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Cambrian — about 0 of 27 occurrencesCambrianOrdovician — about 27 of 27 occurrencesOrdovician489–488 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences488–488 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences488–487 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences487–487 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences487–486 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences486–486 Mya — about 1 occurrence486–486 Mya — about 1 occurrence486–485 Mya — about 1 occurrence485–485 Mya — about 1 occurrence485–484 Mya — about 1 occurrence484–484 Mya — about 1 occurrence484–483 Mya — about 1 occurrence483–483 Mya — about 1 occurrence483–482 Mya — about 1 occurrence482–482 Mya — about 1 occurrence482–481 Mya — about 1 occurrence481–481 Mya — about 1 occurrence481–480 Mya — about 1 occurrence480–480 Mya — about 1 occurrence480–479 Mya — about 1 occurrence479–479 Mya — about 1 occurrence479–478 Mya — about 1 occurrence478–478 Mya — about 1 occurrence478–477 Mya — about 1 occurrence477–477 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences477–476 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences476–476 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences476–475 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences489.4 Mya474.8 Mya

27 occurrences of Laurentoscandodus on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

27 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

9 formations

Tribes Hill — 43.55°N, 73.38°WTribes Hill — 42.98°N, 74.26°WTribes Hill — 42.92°N, 74.42°WKechika — 57.70°N, 124.58°WKechika — 57.87°N, 124.08°WStonehenge — 38.86°N, 78.50°WBliss Sandstone — 32.87°N, 107.18°WGoodwin — 39.08°N, 116.27°WWindfall — 39.20°N, 116.26°WSimeh-Kuh — 36.21°N, 54.23°EHitt Canyon — 32.87°N, 107.18°WWhitehall — 43.86°N, 73.42°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Laurentoscandodus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Laurentoscandodus and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Laurentoscandodus and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

59 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 27 sites for Laurentoscandodus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

10 references

Each of the 27 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Laurentoscandodus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Laurentoscandodus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Laurentoscandodus was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Landing et al. 1996