Damesites
Searched as Kotoceras. The Paleobiology Database treats Damesites as the accepted name.
No picture of Damesites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Damesites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- DesmoceratinaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Ammonoidea
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Ammonoidea
- Motility
- fast-movingPBDB, for Ammonoidea
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda
Time the record covers
At least 395 million years on record.
The record covers at least 468 Mya to 72.2 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 477.1 Mya to 66 Mya.
99 occurrences of Damesites on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
99 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
34 formations
- Saku Formation16
- Jigunsan Formation · Taebaek Group10
- Upper Haborogawa Formation · Yezo Group8
- Ragged Valley Shale Formation · Asuncion Group6
- Redding Formation · Pacheco Group3
- Haslam Formation3
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Damesites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 10 further formations hold fewer occurrences each and are not listed. 20 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Damesites and its relatives
Late CretaceousWhere Damesites and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
264 taxa- Tetragonites glabrus21 sites
- Neophylloceras20 sites
- Gaudryceras (Gaudryceras) denseplicatum19 sites
- Yezoites puerculus17 sites
- Scalarites14 sites
- Sphenoceramus naumanni10 sites
- Eubostrychoceras8 sites
- Mesopuzosia8 sites
- Polyptychoceras pseudogaultinum8 sites
- Baculites6 sites
- Gaudryceras6 sites
- Inoceramus6 sites
- Longibelus matsumotoi6 sites
- Yokoyamaoceras6 sites
- Gaudryceras tenuiliratum4 sites
- Hauericeras (Gardeniceras) gardeni4 sites
- Hyphantoceras (Madagascarites)4 sites
- Inoceramus amakusensis4 sites
- Mytiloides stantoni4 sites
- Tetragonites4 sites
- Acila3 sites
- Amapondella amapondense3 sites
- Anagaudryceras3 sites
- Desmophyllites diphylloides3 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 73 sites for Damesites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
40 references- Paleoecological analysis of ammonoid assemblages in the Turonian Scaphites facies of Hokkaido, Japan16
- Cretaceous stratigraphy in the Chikubetsu area, Hokaido10
- Upper Cretaceous of the Pacific Coast8
- Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California. Part III6
- Three Ordovician cephalopods from the Jigunsan Formation of Korea5
- Preliminary report on the Cretaceous reptile fossils from Hokkaido5
- The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of south Chosen. Paleontology. Part I. Middle Ordovician faunas5
- Integration of macrofossil biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy for the Pacific Coast Upper Cretaceous (Campanian–Maastrichtian) of North America and implications for correlation with the Western Interior and Tethys3
- Ammonite faunas, biostratigraphy, and sequence stratigraphy of the Coniacian-Santonian of the Corbières (NE Pyrénées)3
- Stratigraphic Summary of the Southwestern Region of China3
- The Upper Cretaceous cephalopods of Japan, Part I3
- The crinoid Marsupites in the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, British Columbia: resolution of the Santonian-Campanian boundary in the North Pacific Province2
Each of the 99 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 28 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Damesites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Damesites, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Damesites was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itDesmoceratinae through timeFormations of the Late CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Yabe 1927