Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis
No picture of Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- JunggaroblastusPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Blastoidea
- Life habit
- intermediate-level epifaunalPBDB, for Blastoidea
- Motility
- stationary, attachedPBDB, for Blastoidea
- Vision
- blindPBDB, for Blastoidea
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Echinodermata
Time the record covers
At most 14 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 372.15 Mya and 358.86 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
3 occurrences of Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis on record, most of them in the Devonian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
3 occurrences- Devonian100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.
Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis and its relatives
DevonianWhere Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis and its relatives were recorded in the Devonian.
Found in the same rock
28 taxa- Eutaxocrinus3 sites
- Agathocrinus2 sites
- Eutaxocrinus chinaensis2 sites
- Orophocrinus2 sites
- Sinopetaloblastus jinxingae2 sites
- Taxocrinus anomalus2 sites
- Xinjiangoblastus ornatus2 sites
- Abactinocrinus1 site
- Actinocrinites1 site
- Anamesocrinus1 site
- Carpocrinacea1 site
- Chinacrinus1 site
- Chinacrinus xinjiangensis1 site
- Euonychocrinus1 site
- Grabauicrinus1 site
- Hexacrinites1 site
- Hexacrinites pinnulata1 site
- Houiblastus1 site
- Julieticrinus romeo1 site
- Mongoliacrinus1 site
- Nautiloidea1 site
- Pachylocrinus1 site
- Palmatolepis1 site
- Parisocrinus nodosus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Famennian crinoids and blastoids (Echinodermata) from Mongolia1
- A quadrupling of Famennian pelmatozoan diversity: new Late Devonian blastoids and crinoids from northwest China1
- Echinoderm faunas of the Hongguleleng Formation, Late Devonian (Famennian), Xinjiang-Uyger Autonomous Region, People''s Republic of China1
Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Junggaroblastus hoxtolgayensis was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itJunggaroblastus through timeFormations of the DevonianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Lane et al. 1997