Isotelus susae

No picture of Isotelus susae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Isotelus susae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
IsotelusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Trilobita
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Asaphida
Motility
fast-movingPBDB, for Asaphida
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Asaphidae
Environment
marinePBDB, for Trilobita

Time the record covers

At most 1.4 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 451 Mya and 449.6 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Ordovician — about 10 of 10 occurrencesOrdovician451–451 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences451–450 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences451.5 Mya449.1 Mya

10 occurrences of Isotelus susae on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

10 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

4 formations

Scales Shale — 44.98°N, 93.27°WScales Shale — 42.00°N, 90.50°WWise Lake — 44.98°N, 93.27°WWise Lake — 42.00°N, 90.50°WDubuque — 44.98°N, 93.27°WDubuque — 42.00°N, 90.50°WRed River — 52.06°N, 97.44°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Isotelus susae has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Isotelus susae and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Isotelus susae and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

67 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 10 sites for Isotelus susae, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 10 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Isotelus susae was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Isotelus susae, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itIsotelus through timeFormations of the OrdovicianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Whitfield 1882)