Hippurites resectus

No picture of Hippurites resectus was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Hippurites resectus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At least 4.1 million years on record.

The record covers at least 89.8 Mya to 85.7 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 100.5 Mya to 66 Mya.

Early Cretaceous — about 0 of 13 occurrencesLate Cretaceous — about 13 of 13 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 0 of 13 occurrences101–100 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences100–99 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences99–98 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences98–96 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences96–95 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences95–94 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences94–93 Mya — about 2 occurrences93–92 Mya — about 3 occurrences92–90 Mya — about 3 occurrences90–89 Mya — about 2 occurrences89–88 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences88–87 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences87–86 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences86–84 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences84–83 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences83–82 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences82–81 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences81–80 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences80–78 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences78–77 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences77–76 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences76–75 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences75–74 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences74–72 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences72–71 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences71–70 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences70–69 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences69–68 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences68–67 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences67–65 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences89.8 Mya – 85.7 Mya101.2 Mya65.3 Mya

13 occurrences of Hippurites resectus on record, most of them in the Late Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

13 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

5 formations

Wadi As Sir Limestone — 32.36°N, 35.74°EWadi As Sir Limestone — 32.40°N, 35.81°EWadi As Sir Limestone — 32.43°N, 35.85°ESant Corneli — 42.03°N, 0.83°EGornji Humac — 43.02°N, 16.22°EEl Abra — 22.93°N, 100.65°WVillaescusa de las Torres — 42.68°N, 4.07°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Hippurites resectus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 4 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Hippurites resectus and its relatives

Late Cretaceous

Where Hippurites resectus and its relatives were recorded in the Late Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

11 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Hippurites resectus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

8 references

Each of the 13 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Licence
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Commercial use
the licence does not allow it

No picture of Hippurites resectus was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Hippurites resectus firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itFormations of the Late CretaceousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.