Diporites
No picture of Diporites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Diporites firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- PlantaePBDB
Time the record covers
At least 42 million years on record.
The record covers at least 66 Mya to 23.04 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 72.2 Mya to 15.98 Mya.
16 occurrences of Diporites on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
16 occurrences- Late Cretaceous13%
- Eocene19%
- Oligocene25%
- Miocene44%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
6 formations
- Monte Leon Formation2
- Foulden Hills Diatomite Formation2
- Lisbon Formation2
- Monte León Formation1
- Old Church Formation1
- Winona Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Diporites has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 7 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Found in the same rock
148 taxa- Tetracolporopollenites4 sites
- Triatriopollenites4 sites
- Triporopollenites4 sites
- Carya3 sites
- Celtis3 sites
- Plicatopollis triradiata3 sites
- Proteacidites3 sites
- Pseudolaesopollis ventosa3 sites
- Rhoipites capax3 sites
- <Momipites-Plicatopollis-Platycaryapollenites complex>2 sites
- Botryococcus braunii2 sites
- Casuarina2 sites
- Echiperiporites tschudyi2 sites
- Graminidites2 sites
- Incertae <sedis D>2 sites
- Monocolpopollenites2 sites
- Monocolpopollenites spheroidites2 sites
- Nothofagus2 sites
- Podocarpus2 sites
- Proxapertites2 sites
- Rhoipites latus2 sites
- Siltaria2 sites
- Syncolporites2 sites
- Tricolpites2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Diporites, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
6 references- Palinología del Paleogeno tardío-Neógeno temprano, pozo Aries x-1, plataforma Continental Argentina, Tierra del Fuego5
- Palinoestratigrafía de depósitos del Oligoceno tardío-Mioceno en el área sur del Golfo San Jorge, provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina3
- Sporomorph biostratigraphy, floral changes, and paleoclimatology, Eocene and Earliest Oligocen of the eastern Gulf Coast3
- Palynology of the early Miocene Foulden Maar, Otago, New Zealand: Diversity following destruction2
- Palynologuie et stratigraphie du Crétacé des Bassin du Sénégal et Cote d'Ivoire2
- Sporomorph Correlation and Paleoecology, Piney Point and Old Church Formations, Pamunkey River, Virginia1
Each of the 16 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Diporites was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Diporites firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
No 3D scan was found. Smithsonian Open Access, MorphoSource and Sketchfab were all searched.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itPlantae through timeThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Van der Hammen 1954