Archeoentactinia incaensis

No picture of Archeoentactinia incaensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Archeoentactinia incaensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
ArcheoentactiniaPBDB
Diet
omnivorePBDB, for Radiolaria
Life habit
planktonicPBDB, for Radiolaria
Motility
passively mobilePBDB, for Radiolaria
Environment
marinePBDB, for Radiolaria

Time the record covers

At most 1.5 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 504.5 Mya and 503 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Cambrian — about 2 of 2 occurrencesCambrian505–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–504 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences504–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences503–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences503–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences503–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences503–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences503–503 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences505 Mya502.5 Mya

2 occurrences of Archeoentactinia incaensis on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Inca — 19.50°S, 138.93°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Archeoentactinia incaensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Archeoentactinia incaensis and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Archeoentactinia incaensis and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

8 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Archeoentactinia incaensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

3D model

Source
Sketchfab
Licence
CC Attribution
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record

No picture of Archeoentactinia incaensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Archeoentactinia incaensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Won and Below 1999