Acrodus cuneocostatus

No picture of Acrodus cuneocostatus was found. Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Acrodus cuneocostatus itself, so it was not used. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Acrodus cuneocostatus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
AcrodusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Chondrichthyes
Life habit
nektonicPBDB, for Chondrichthyes
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Chondrichthyes

Time the record covers

At least 5.6 million years on record.

The record covers at least 250.8 Mya to 245.19 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 251.1 Mya to 244.4 Mya.

Early Triassic — about 5 of 6 occurrencesEarly TriassicMiddle Triassic — about 1 of 6 occurrencesMiddle Triassic251–251 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 2 occurrences251–251 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences251–250 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences250–250 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences250–250 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences250–250 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences250–249 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences249–249 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences249–249 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences249–249 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences245–245 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences245–245 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences245–245 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences245–244 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences244–244 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences250.8 Mya245.19 Mya251.6 Mya243.9 Mya

6 occurrences of Acrodus cuneocostatus on record, most of them in the Early Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

6 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Zhitkov — 42.93°N, 132.43°EFavret — 40.06°N, 117.56°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Acrodus cuneocostatus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Acrodus cuneocostatus and its relatives

Early Triassic

Where Acrodus cuneocostatus and its relatives were recorded in the Early Triassic.

Found in the same rock

70 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 6 sites for Acrodus cuneocostatus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 6 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Acrodus cuneocostatus was found. Wikidata, iDigBio and Smithsonian Open Access were searched and had none.

Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Acrodus cuneocostatus itself, so it was not used.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Acrodus cuneocostatus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Acrodus cuneocostatus was found in Smithsonian Open Access and Sketchfab.

MorphoSource was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Cuny et al. 2001