Xenochelys lostcabinensis

No picture of Xenochelys lostcabinensis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Xenochelys lostcabinensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
XenochelysPBDB
Diet
omnivorePBDB, for Cryptodira
Life habit
aquaticPBDB, for Cryptodira
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
Environment
freshwaterPBDB, for Cryptodira

Time the record covers

At most 11 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 56 Mya and 45.9 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Paleocene — about 0 of 10 occurrencesEocene — about 10 of 10 occurrencesEocene56–56 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences56–55 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences55–55 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences55–55 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences55–54 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences54–54 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences54–54 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences54–53 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences53–53 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences53–52 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences52–52 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences52–52 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences52–51 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences51–51 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences51–51 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences51–50 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences50–50 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences50–49 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences49–49 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences49–49 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences49–48 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences48–48 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences48–48 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences48–47 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences47–47 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences47–47 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences47–46 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences46–46 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences56.5 Mya45.4 Mya

10 occurrences of Xenochelys lostcabinensis on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

10 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Wind River — 43.20°N, 107.10°WWind River — 43.03°N, 108.63°WWind River — 43.27°N, 107.50°WWasatch — 42.76°N, 109.92°WWasatch — 41.64°N, 108.53°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Xenochelys lostcabinensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Xenochelys lostcabinensis and its relatives

Eocene

Where Xenochelys lostcabinensis and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.

Found in the same rock

12 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 10 sites for Xenochelys lostcabinensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 10 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Xenochelys lostcabinensis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Xenochelys lostcabinensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Xenochelys lostcabinensis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hutchison 1991