Ticinepomis ducanensis

No picture of Ticinepomis ducanensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ticinepomis ducanensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
TicinepomisPBDB
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes

Time the record covers

At most 2 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 241.464 Mya and 239.48 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Middle Triassic — about 2 of 2 occurrencesMiddle Triassic241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–241 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–240 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences240–239 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences241.96 Mya238.98 Mya

2 occurrences of Ticinepomis ducanensis on record, most of them in the Middle Triassic. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Prosanto — 46.68°N, 9.82°EBesano — 45.91°N, 8.95°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Ticinepomis ducanensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Ticinepomis ducanensis and its relatives

Middle Triassic

Where Ticinepomis ducanensis and its relatives were recorded in the Middle Triassic.

Found in the same rock

No other named taxon is catalogued from any of those sites.

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Ticinepomis ducanensis, and this reads all of them.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Ticinepomis ducanensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ticinepomis ducanensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Ticinepomis ducanensis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itTicinepomis through timeFormations of the Middle TriassicThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Ferrante et al. 2023