Prosbole dio

No picture of Prosbole dio was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Prosbole dio, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
ProsbolePBDB
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Arthropoda
Environment
terrestrialPBDB, for Insecta

Time the record covers

At most 8.9 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 283.3 Mya and 274.4 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Permian — about 1 of 1 occurrencePermian283–283 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences283–283 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences283–282 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences282–282 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences282–282 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences282–281 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences281–281 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences281–281 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences281–281 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences281–280 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences280–280 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences280–280 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences280–279 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences279–279 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences279–279 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences279–278 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences278–278 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences278–278 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences278–277 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences277–277 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences277–277 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences277–276 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences276–276 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences276–276 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences276–275 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences275–275 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences275–275 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences275–274 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences283.8 Mya273.9 Mya

1 occurrence of Prosbole dio on record, most of them in the Permian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Salagou — 43.66°N, 3.20°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Prosbole dio has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Prosbole dio and its relatives

Permian

Where Prosbole dio and its relatives were recorded in the Permian.

Found in the same rock

1 taxon

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Prosbole dio, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Prosbole dio was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Prosbole dio, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Prosbole dio was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itProsbole through timeFormations of the PermianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Prokop et al. 2015