Plagiophthalmus oviformis

No picture of Plagiophthalmus oviformis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Plagiophthalmus oviformis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
PlagiophthalmusPBDB
Diet
detritivorePBDB, for Goniodromitidae
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Decapoda
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Malacostraca
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Malacostraca

Time the record covers

At least 9.6 million years on record.

The record covers at least 110.1 Mya to 100.5 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 113.2 Mya to 93.9 Mya.

Early Cretaceous — about 2 of 5 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 3 of 5 occurrencesLate Cretaceous114–113 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences113–112 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences112–112 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences112–111 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences111–110 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences110–110 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences101–100 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences100–99 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences99–99 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences99–98 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences98–97 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences97–97 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences97–96 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences96–95 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences95–95 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences95–94 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences94–93 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences110.1 Mya100.5 Mya113.7 Mya93.4 Mya

5 occurrences of Plagiophthalmus oviformis on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

5 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Gault — 51.94°N, 0.64°WUpper Greensand — 50.79°N, 3.12°WChalk — 50.71°N, 3.08°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Plagiophthalmus oviformis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Found in the same rock

16 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Plagiophthalmus oviformis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Plagiophthalmus oviformis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Plagiophthalmus oviformis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Plagiophthalmus oviformis was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itPlagiophthalmus through timeThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Bell 1863