Palaeoschmidities

No picture of Palaeoschmidities was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Palaeoschmidities firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 3.7 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 508.2 Mya and 504.5 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Cambrian — about 1 of 1 occurrenceCambrian508–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508–508 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–507 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences507–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–506 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences506–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–505 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences505–504 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences508.7 Mya504 Mya

1 occurrence of Palaeoschmidities on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Coonigan — 31.17°S, 141.32°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Palaeoschmidities has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Palaeoschmidities and its relatives

Cambrian

Where Palaeoschmidities and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.

Found in the same rock

26 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Palaeoschmidities, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Palaeoschmidities was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Palaeoschmidities firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Palaeoschmidities was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itFormations of the CambrianThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Koneva 1979