Mictosaukia
No picture of Mictosaukia was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Mictosaukia, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- DikelocephalidaePBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Trilobita
- Life habit
- low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Asaphida
- Motility
- fast-movingPBDB, for Asaphida
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Dikelocephalidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Trilobita
Time the record covers
At most 11 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 497 Mya and 486.85 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
28 occurrences of Mictosaukia on record, most of them in the Cambrian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
28 occurrences- Cambrian100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
9 formations
- Fengshan Formation11
- Shenjiawan Formation5
- Pacoota Formation3
- Tomahawk Formation2
- Tangcun Formation2
- Mila Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Mictosaukia has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Mictosaukia and its relatives
CambrianWhere Mictosaukia and its relatives were recorded in the Cambrian.
Found in the same rock
42 taxa- Cymatopegma semiplicatum5 sites
- Furnishina furnishi5 sites
- Prooneotodus5 sites
- Calvinella4 sites
- Diaphanodus4 sites
- Phakelodus tenuis4 sites
- Teridontus nakamurai4 sites
- Cordylodus proavus3 sites
- Eoconodontus notchpeakensis3 sites
- Kimopegma pinnatum3 sites
- Tellerina3 sites
- Changia2 sites
- Diaphanodus compressus2 sites
- Fryxellodontus2 sites
- Granatodontus2 sites
- Leiostegium2 sites
- Lophosaukia2 sites
- Neoagnostus quasibilobus2 sites
- Pinnocaris robusta2 sites
- Proconodontus muelleri2 sites
- Prooneotodus gallatini2 sites
- Rotundoconus2 sites
- Cambrooistododus cambricus1 site
- Cambrooistodus1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 13 sites for Mictosaukia, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
10 references- The recommended Cambrian - Ordovician global Boundry stratotype of the Xiaoyangqiao section (Dayangcha, Jilin Province), China10
- Cambrian and Ordovician rostroconch molluscs from Northern Australia5
- Cambrian of the Hunan-Guizhou region, south China4
- Upper Cambrian trilobites from Tangshan, Hebei Province, North China2
- Late Late Cambrian trilobites from the Tangcun Formation of Jingxian, southern Anhui2
- Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobites of the Samur Dag area, south of Hakkari, southeastern Turkey1
- Ordovician Trilobites from Iran1
- Latest Middle Cambrian metazoan reef from northern Iran1
- Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobites from Henan1
- Upper Cambrian biostratigraphy and trilobite faunas of the Cili-Taoyuan area, northwestern Hunan, China1
Each of the 28 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Mictosaukia was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Mictosaukia, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Mictosaukia was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itDikelocephalidae through timeFormations of the CambrianThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Shergold 1975