Lithostrobus
No picture of Lithostrobus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithostrobus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- EucyrtiidaePBDB
Time the record covers
At least 83 million years on record.
The record covers at least 83.6 Mya to 11.7 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 89.8 Mya to 0 Mya.
35 occurrences of Lithostrobus on record, most of them in the Paleocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
35 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
4 formations
- Mead Hill Formation11
- Kirsanovskaya Formation2
- Hochmoos Formation · Gosau Group1
- A Formation · Hakobuchi Group1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Lithostrobus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 20 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Lithostrobus and its relatives
PaleoceneWhere Lithostrobus and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.
Found in the same rock
219 taxa- Amphipyndax stocki27 sites
- Lithelius25 sites
- Actinomminae23 sites
- Amphisphaera23 sites
- Dictyomitra andersoni23 sites
- Eucyrtidiidae23 sites
- Lithomespilus23 sites
- Dictyomitra multicostata22 sites
- Mita22 sites
- Stichomitra carnegiense21 sites
- Archaeodictyomitra20 sites
- Myllocercion20 sites
- Spongodiscus20 sites
- Spongotrochus20 sites
- Sponguridae20 sites
- Amphymenium19 sites
- Bathropyramis19 sites
- Cornutella californica19 sites
- Protoxiphotractus19 sites
- Lithomelissa18 sites
- Spongodiscidae18 sites
- Theocampe18 sites
- Tholodiscus ocellatus18 sites
- Amphipternis17 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 35 sites for Lithostrobus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
7 references- Stratigraphic, paleontological and geochemical data from Upper Cretaceous and Lower Paleocene strata in southeastern Marlborough, New Zealand23
- Input Site U14143
- Upper Cretaceous Radiolaria from the Russian Platform (Moscow Basin)3
- Upper Cretaceous (Santonian-Campanian) radiolarians from Voronesh Anticline, southwestern Russia2
- Radiolarian biostratigraphic study of the Hakobuchi Group in the Nakatonbetsu area, north Hokkaido2
- Site U15251
- Faziesverteilung und Fossilvergesellschaftungen im karbonatischen Flachwassser-Milieu der alpinen Oberkreide (Gosau-Formation) [Facies and fossils from the Upper Cretaceous carbonate shallow water deposits of the Eastern Alps (Gosau Formation)]1
Each of the 35 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Lithostrobus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithostrobus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Lithostrobus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itEucyrtiidae through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Bütschli 1882