Lithophyllum maemongense
No picture of Lithophyllum maemongense was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithophyllum maemongense, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- LithophyllumPBDB
- Diet
- "photoautotroph"PBDB, for Rhodophyta
Time the record covers
At least 2.1 million years on record.
The record covers at least 15.98 Mya to 13.82 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 23.04 Mya to 11.63 Mya.
8 occurrences of Lithophyllum maemongense on record, most of them in the Miocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
8 occurrences- Miocene100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Lithophyllum maemongense has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 2 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Lithophyllum maemongense and its relatives
MioceneWhere Lithophyllum maemongense and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.
Found in the same rock
26 taxa- Jania ucrainica1 site
- Karpathia sphaerocellulosa1 site
- Lithophyllum albanense1 site
- Lithophyllum anguineum1 site
- Lithophyllum intumescens1 site
- Lithophyllum kamptneri1 site
- Lithophyllum lithothamnioides1 site
- Lithophyllum nitorum1 site
- Lithophyllum prelichenoides1 site
- Lithothamnion1 site
- Lithothamnion romosissimum1 site
- Lithothamnium gaschei1 site
- Lithothamnium lacroixi1 site
- Lithothamnium ladronicum1 site
- Lithothamnium parvulum1 site
- Lithothamnium praefruticulosum1 site
- Lithothamnium prascoi1 site
- Lithothamnium ramosissimum1 site
- Lithothamnium saxorum1 site
- Lithothamnium subtile1 site
- Mesophyllum galettoi1 site
- Mesophyllum ingestum1 site
- Mesophyllum koritzae1 site
- Mesophyllum rigidum1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Lithophyllum maemongense, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
4 references- Fossil and recent calcareous algae from Guam5
- Red algae from the Pinczow limestones (middle Miocene, Swietokrzyskie mountains, Poland)1
- Significato e caratteristiche degli episodi a rhodoliti al "Top" del Serravalliano tipo1
- Corallinacées du miocène de la plaine orientale corse1
Each of the 8 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Lithophyllum maemongense was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Lithophyllum maemongense, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Lithophyllum maemongense was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itLithophyllum through timeFormations of the MioceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Johnson 1964