Latheticocarcinus affinis

No picture of Latheticocarcinus affinis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Latheticocarcinus affinis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
LatheticocarcinusPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Decapoda
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Decapoda
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Malacostraca
Vision
well-developedPBDB, for Malacostraca

Time the record covers

At most 4.4 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 66 Mya and 61.66 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Late Cretaceous — about 0 of 2 occurrencesPaleocene — about 2 of 2 occurrencesPaleocene66–66 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences66–66 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences66–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–65 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences65–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–64 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences64–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–63 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences63–62 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences62–62 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences66.5 Mya61.2 Mya

2 occurrences of Latheticocarcinus affinis on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Latheticocarcinus affinis and its relatives

Paleocene

Where Latheticocarcinus affinis and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.

Found in the same rock

9 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Latheticocarcinus affinis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Latheticocarcinus affinis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Latheticocarcinus affinis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Latheticocarcinus affinis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itLatheticocarcinus through timeFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Jakobsen and Collins 1997)