Isectolophus annectens

No picture of Isectolophus annectens was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Isectolophus annectens, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
IsectolophusPBDB
Diet
browserPBDB, for Tapiromorpha
Life habit
ground dwellingPBDB, for Tapiromorpha
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
Environment
terrestrialPBDB, for Eutheria

Time the record covers

At most 6.2 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 45.9 Mya and 39.7 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Eocene — about 11 of 11 occurrencesEocene46–46 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences46–45 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences45–45 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences45–45 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences45–45 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences45–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–44 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences44–43 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences43–43 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences43–43 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences43–43 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences43–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–42 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences42–41 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences41–41 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences41–41 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences41–41 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences41–40 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences40–40 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences40–40 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences40–40 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences46.4 Mya39.2 Mya

11 occurrences of Isectolophus annectens on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

11 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Uinta — 40.07°N, 109.28°WUinta — 40.20°N, 109.90°WUinta — 40.07°N, 109.70°WWashakie — 40.60°N, 108.10°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Isectolophus annectens has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Isectolophus annectens and its relatives

Eocene

Where Isectolophus annectens and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.

Found in the same rock

186 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 8 sites for Isectolophus annectens, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

6 references

Each of the 11 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Isectolophus annectens was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Isectolophus annectens, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Isectolophus annectens was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Scott and Osborn 1887