Incrotonipollis neyvelii
No picture of Incrotonipollis neyvelii was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Incrotonipollis neyvelii firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At most 17 million years on record.
Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 72.2 Mya and 56 Mya, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.
13 occurrences of Incrotonipollis neyvelii on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
13 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
3 formations
- Bara Formation · Ranikot Group5
- Sohnari Formation · Ranikot Group3
- Lakhra Formation · Ranikot Group2
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Incrotonipollis neyvelii has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 3 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Incrotonipollis neyvelii and its relatives
PaleoceneWhere Incrotonipollis neyvelii and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.
Found in the same rock
77 taxa- Proxapertites assamicus12 sites
- Retistephanocolpites10 sites
- Cupanieidites flaccidiformis9 sites
- Proxapertites operculatus9 sites
- Cricotriporites8 sites
- Longapertites8 sites
- Longapertites retipilatus8 sites
- Incrotonipollis burdwanensis7 sites
- Intrareticulitis brevis7 sites
- "Myricaceoipollenites dubius"6 sites
- Matanomadhiasculcites maximus6 sites
- Assamialetes emendatus5 sites
- Callophyllumpollenites cf. rotundus5 sites
- Cupanieidites5 sites
- Echitriporites trianguliformis5 sites
- Porocolpopollenites aff. ollivierae5 sites
- <Milfordia minima/hungarica>4 sites
- cf. Porocolpopollenites <sp. A>4 sites
- Cupanieidites aff. flabelliformis4 sites
- Psilodiporites hammenii4 sites
- Spinizonocolpites prominatus4 sites
- Triangulorites triradiatus4 sites
- Triatriopollenites4 sites
- Uigopollis tetraporites4 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 13 sites for Incrotonipollis neyvelii, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
2 references- Palynological contribution to geologic mapping of coal-bearing upper Paleocene rocks in the lower Indus coal region, Pakistan12
- New mammals from the Naskal intertrappean site and the age of India’s earliest eutherians1
Each of the 13 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Incrotonipollis neyvelii was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Incrotonipollis neyvelii firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Incrotonipollis neyvelii was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.