Hormotoma neglecta

No picture of Hormotoma neglecta was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Hormotoma neglecta, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
HormotomaPBDB
Diet
herbivorePBDB, for Hormotoma
Life habit
epifaunalPBDB, for Hormotoma
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Hormotoma
Vision
limitedPBDB, for Murchisoniina
Environment
coastal,marinePBDB, for Murchisoniina

Time the record covers

At least 1 million years on record.

The record covers at least 450.2 Mya to 449.2 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 457.3 Mya to 448.8 Mya.

Ordovician — about 11 of 11 occurrencesOrdovician457–457 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences457–457 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences457–457 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences457–456 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences456–456 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences456–456 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences456–455 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences455–455 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences455–455 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences455–454 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences454–454 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences454–454 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences454–453 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences453–453 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences453–453 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences453–452 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences452–452 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences452–452 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences452–451 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences451–451 Mya — about 1 occurrence451–450 Mya — about 1 occurrence450–450 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences450–450 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences449–449 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences449–449 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences450.2 Mya – 449.2 Mya457.8 Mya448.3 Mya

11 occurrences of Hormotoma neglecta on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

11 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

7 formations

Dunleith — 42.00°N, 90.50°WCummingsville — 46.00°N, 94.00°WProsser Limestone — 46.00°N, 94.00°WStewartville — 46.00°N, 94.00°WWise Lake — 42.00°N, 90.50°WProsser — 44.50°N, 92.90°WCape Calhoun — 80.08°N, 67.00°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Hormotoma neglecta has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Hormotoma neglecta and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Hormotoma neglecta and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

153 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 11 sites for Hormotoma neglecta, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

3 references

Each of the 11 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to the Paleobiology Database's own record for the work.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Hormotoma neglecta was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Hormotoma neglecta, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Hormotoma neglecta was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Ulrich and Scofield 1897)