Gobiconodon haizhouensis

No picture of Gobiconodon haizhouensis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Gobiconodon haizhouensis itself, so it was not used. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Gobiconodon haizhouensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
GobiconodonPBDB
Diet
insectivorePBDB, for Mammaliaformes
Life habit
scansorialPBDB, for Mammaliaformes
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
Environment
terrestrialPBDB, for Mammalia

Time the record covers

At least 96 million years on record.

The record covers at least 100.5 Mya to 3.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 121.4 Mya to 2.58 Mya.

Early Cretaceous — about 1 of 2 occurrencesEarly CretaceousLate Cretaceous — about 0 of 2 occurrencesPaleocene — about 0 of 2 occurrencesEocene — about 0 of 2 occurrencesOligocene — about 0 of 2 occurrencesMiocene — about 0 of 2 occurrencesPliocene — about 1 of 2 occurrencesPleistocene — about 0 of 2 occurrences124–120 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences120–116 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences116–111 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences111–107 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences107–103 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences103–99 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences4.3–204 ka Mya — about 1 occurrence100.5 Mya3.6 Mya124 Mya204 ka

2 occurrences of Gobiconodon haizhouensis on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

2 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

2 formations

Lillo — 51.21°N, 4.43°EFuxin — 42.02°N, 121.67°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Gobiconodon haizhouensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Found in the same rock

10 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 2 sites for Gobiconodon haizhouensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

2 references

Each of the 2 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Gobiconodon haizhouensis was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Gobiconodon haizhouensis itself, so it was not used.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Gobiconodon haizhouensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Gobiconodon haizhouensis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itGobiconodon through timeThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Kusuhashi et al. 2016