Forcipites sabulosus

No picture of Forcipites sabulosus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Forcipites sabulosus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
ForcipitesPBDB
Diet
"photoautotroph"PBDB, for Streptophyta

Time the record covers

At least 28 million years on record.

The record covers at least 66 Mya to 37.71 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 83.6 Mya to 33.9 Mya.

Late Cretaceous — about 12 of 16 occurrencesLate CretaceousPaleocene — about 3 of 16 occurrencesPaleoceneEocene — about 1 of 16 occurrencesEoceneOligocene — about 0 of 16 occurrences85–83 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences83–81 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences81–79 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences79–78 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences78–76 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences76–74 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences74–73 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences73–71 Mya — about 3 occurrences71–69 Mya — about 3 occurrences69–67 Mya — about 3 occurrences67–66 Mya — about 3 occurrences66–64 Mya — about 1 occurrence64–62 Mya — about 1 occurrence62–60 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences38–36 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences36–35 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences35–33 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences66 Mya37.71 Mya85 Mya33 Mya

16 occurrences of Forcipites sabulosus on record. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

16 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

5 formations

Monte Chico — 51.59°S, 72.41°WMonte Chico — 51.18°S, 72.29°WLópez de Bertodano — 64.32°S, 56.87°WSobral — 64.28°S, 56.70°WSnow Hill — 63.88°S, 57.60°WLopez de Bertodano — 63.88°S, 57.60°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Forcipites sabulosus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Found in the same rock

222 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 16 sites for Forcipites sabulosus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

4 references

Each of the 16 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Forcipites sabulosus was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Forcipites sabulosus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Forcipites sabulosus was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itForcipites through timeThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Dettmann and Jarzen 1988