Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis
No picture of Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 7.1 million years on record.
The record covers at least 41.03 Mya to 33.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 48.07 Mya to 23.04 Mya.
20 occurrences of Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
20 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
1 formation
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 19 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis and its relatives
EoceneWhere Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
170 taxa- Triatriopollenites20 sites
- Tricolporopollenites20 sites
- Tetracolporopollenites19 sites
- Inaperturopollenites18 sites
- Laevigatosporites18 sites
- Monocolpopollenites18 sites
- Plicatopollis18 sites
- Polyporopollenites18 sites
- Varia indet.18 sites
- Momipites17 sites
- <Leiotriletes/Toroisporis group>16 sites
- Botryococcus15 sites
- Punctilongisulcites microechinatus15 sites
- Triporopollenites15 sites
- <Punctatosporites/Verrucatosporites>14 sites
- Ilexpollenites14 sites
- Polypodiaceoisporites14 sites
- Celtipollenites13 sites
- Milfordia13 sites
- Pentapollis pentangulus13 sites
- Trivestbulopollenites betuloides12 sites
- Pityosporites11 sites
- Platycaryapollenites11 sites
- Intratriporopollenites10 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 20 sites for Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
3 references- Vegetation dynamics in a disturbed lacustrine record: The Eocene maar lake of Groß-Zimmern (Hesse, Germany)18
- The Middle Eocene plant taphocoenosis from Eckfeld (Eifel, Germany)1
- Crocodilian and palaeobotanical findings from the Tertiary Lignites of the As Pontes Basin (Galicia, NW-Spain) (Crocodylia, Plantae)1
Each of the 20 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis was found. Wikipedia and Wikidata were searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Emmapollis pseudoemmaensis was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.