Desmochitina

Desmochitina is an extinct genus of chitinozoans. It was described by Alfred Eisenack in 1931.

No picture of Desmochitina was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. GBIF was not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Desmochitina firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
RhizopodeaPBDB

Time the record covers

At least 93 million years on record.

The record covers at least 477.1 Mya to 383.4 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 486.85 Mya to 382.31 Mya.

Cambrian — about 0 of 24 occurrencesOrdovician — about 21 of 24 occurrencesOrdovicianSilurian — about 2 of 24 occurrencesSilurianDevonian — about 1 of 24 occurrencesDevonian489–485 Mya — about 0.8 occurrences485–482 Mya — about 2 occurrences482–478 Mya — about 2 occurrences478–474 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences471–467 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences467–464 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences464–460 Mya — about 1 occurrence460–456 Mya — about 1 occurrence456–453 Mya — about 1 occurrence453–449 Mya — about 4 occurrences449–445 Mya — about 2 occurrences445–442 Mya — about 5 occurrences424–420 Mya — about 2 occurrences420–416 Mya — about 0.3 occurrences384–380 Mya — about 1 occurrence477.1 Mya383.4 Mya489 Mya380 Mya

24 occurrences of Desmochitina on record, most of them in the Ordovician. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

24 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

16 formations

Kamlak — 51.62°N, 85.67°EPozary — 49.90°N, 14.02°ECedarburg — 32.30°S, 18.97°EEllis Bay — 49.31°N, 61.84°WEllis Bay — 49.80°N, 64.42°WGualcamayo — 30.00°S, 69.00°WPont-de-Caen — 49.00°N, 1.00°WValle Syncline Silt & Sandstone — 38.00°N, 6.00°WLouredo — 40.00°N, 8.00°WSaunja — 58.84°N, 24.98°EHulderstad — 58.84°N, 24.98°EMoe — 58.84°N, 24.98°ESan Benito — 17.18°S, 66.25°WStirnas — 57.03°N, 22.78°EVaureal — 49.31°N, 61.84°WGümüşali — 37.89°N, 36.00°EWhirlpool — 43.12°N, 79.05°W

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Desmochitina has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Desmochitina and its relatives

Ordovician

Where Desmochitina and its relatives were recorded in the Ordovician.

Found in the same rock

180 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 18 sites for Desmochitina, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

14 references

Each of the 24 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. 2 further references are not listed. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Desmochitina was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

GBIF was not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Desmochitina firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Desmochitina was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

The description on this site

Licence
CC BY-SA 4.0

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.