Costatumulus farleyensis

No picture of Costatumulus farleyensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Costatumulus farleyensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
CostatumulusPBDB
Diet
suspension feederPBDB, for Productidina
Life habit
low-level epifaunalPBDB, for Productidina
Motility
stationaryPBDB, for Productidina
Vision
blindPBDB, for Strophomenata
Environment
marinePBDB, for Lophophorata

Time the record covers

At least 23 million years on record.

The record covers at least 307 Mya to 283.3 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 323.4 Mya to 274.4 Mya.

Carboniferous — about 1 of 78 occurrencesCarboniferousPermian — about 77 of 78 occurrencesPermian324–323 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences323–321 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences321–319 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences319–318 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences318–316 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences316–314 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences314–312 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences312–311 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences311–309 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences309–307 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences307–306 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences294–292 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences292–290 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences290–289 Mya — about 14 occurrences289–287 Mya — about 17 occurrences287–285 Mya — about 17 occurrences285–284 Mya — about 17 occurrences284–282 Mya — about 4 occurrences282–280 Mya — about 2 occurrences280–279 Mya — about 2 occurrences279–277 Mya — about 2 occurrences277–275 Mya — about 2 occurrences275–273 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences307 Mya283.3 Mya324 Mya273 Mya

78 occurrences of Costatumulus farleyensis on record, most of them in the Permian. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

78 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

16 formations

Tiverton — 21.50°S, 148.50°ETiverton — 21.20°S, 148.32°ETiverton — 21.50°S, 147.30°ETiverton — 21.44°S, 148.54°EFarley — 32.85°S, 151.27°EFarley — 32.87°S, 151.21°EFarley — 32.85°S, 151.26°EFarley — 32.72°S, 151.54°EFarley — 32.78°S, 151.57°EBuffel — 25.36°S, 150.29°EYarrol — 24.68°S, 151.06°EYarrol — 24.95°S, 151.35°ERammutt — 26.20°S, 152.68°ECattle Creek — 25.21°S, 148.78°EYessabah — 30.92°S, 152.45°EYessabah — 30.98°S, 152.35°EYessabah — 31.11°S, 152.71°ESilver Spur — 28.85°S, 151.24°EColraine — 31.92°S, 152.25°EColraine — 31.90°S, 152.50°EMojon de Hierro — 43.50°S, 70.75°WBerserker — 23.39°S, 150.57°ELizzie Creek — 22.00°S, 149.00°EGrange Mudstone — 42.75°S, 147.18°ENassau — 42.75°S, 147.19°EBerriedale — 42.75°S, 147.19°EGray Siltstone — 41.65°S, 148.24°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Costatumulus farleyensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 9 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Costatumulus farleyensis and its relatives

Permian

Where Costatumulus farleyensis and its relatives were recorded in the Permian.

Found in the same rock

143 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 78 sites for Costatumulus farleyensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

10 references

Each of the 78 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Costatumulus farleyensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Costatumulus farleyensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Costatumulus farleyensis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Etheridge and Dun 1909)