Chlamys biarritzensis
No picture of Chlamys biarritzensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys biarritzensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- ChlamysPBDB
- Diet
- suspension feederPBDB, for Chlamys
- Life habit
- epifaunalPBDB, for Chlamys
- Motility
- stationary, attachedPBDB, for Chlamys
- Vision
- limitedPBDB, for Pectinidae
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Pectinida
Time the record covers
At least 7.1 million years on record.
The record covers at least 41.03 Mya to 33.9 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 48.07 Mya to 23.04 Mya.
17 occurrences of Chlamys biarritzensis on record, most of them in the Eocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
17 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
- Vic-Igualada Formation3
- Marne di Priabona Formation1
- Chiampo Marble Formation1
- Mera Formation1
- Ardanatz Sandstone Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Chlamys biarritzensis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 10 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Chlamys biarritzensis and its relatives
EoceneWhere Chlamys biarritzensis and its relatives were recorded in the Eocene.
Found in the same rock
304 taxa- Gigantostrea gigantica6 sites
- Spondylus6 sites
- Ostrea5 sites
- Seraphs5 sites
- Crassatella4 sites
- Spondylus buchi4 sites
- Aequipecten3 sites
- Chama3 sites
- Cypraedia elegans3 sites
- Gari3 sites
- Lentipecten corneus3 sites
- Lima3 sites
- Lopha3 sites
- Lucina3 sites
- Pitar3 sites
- Terebellum fusiforme3 sites
- Turritella3 sites
- Vulsella (Vulsella) crispata3 sites
- Angaria2 sites
- Anomia tenuistriata2 sites
- Arca biangula2 sites
- Barbatia (Barbatia)2 sites
- Barbatia (Barbatia) appendiculata2 sites
- Barbatia (Barbatia) appendiculata sokolovi2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 15 sites for Chlamys biarritzensis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
9 references- Karagyuleva, 19645
- Mesopristis nov. gen. osonensis nov. sp., nuevo género y especie de pez-sierra del Eoceno de Vic, (Catalunya, NE. de España)3
- Fauna Fosila din Oligocenul de la Piatra Neamt2
- Fauna de moluste a depozitelor Paleogene din nord-vestul Transilvaniei [Molluscan fauna from Paleogene deposits from NW Transilvania]2
- Fossil associations from the middle and upper Eocene strata of the Pamplona Basin and surrounding areas (Navarre, western Pyrenees)1
- A new species of Spirulirostra (Cephalopoda Coleoidea) from Venetian Middle Eocene (Italy)1
- Fossil cuttlebones in the Vicentinian Priabonian (Late Eocene, Veneto Region, NE Italy)1
- Five shallow benthic mollusc faunas from the Upper Eocene (Baron, Priabona, Garoowe, Nanggulan, Takashima)1
- Upper Eocene foraminifera of East Poland and their paleogeographical meaning1
Each of the 17 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Chlamys biarritzensis was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chlamys biarritzensis, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Chlamys biarritzensis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itChlamys through timeFormations of the EoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (d'Archiac 1846)