Cervisiella
No picture of Cervisiella was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Cervisiella firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
Time the record covers
At least 4.3 million years on record.
The record covers at least 66 Mya to 61.66 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 72.2 Mya to 59.24 Mya.
52 occurrences of Cervisiella on record, most of them in the Paleocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
52 occurrences- Late Cretaceous29%
- Paleocene71%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
- Jagüel Formation28
- Campo Bola Formation19
- Pedro Luro Formation2
- La Colonia Formation1
- Paleocene subsurface Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Cervisiella has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 1 occurrence has no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Cervisiella and its relatives
PaleoceneWhere Cervisiella and its relatives were recorded in the Paleocene.
Found in the same rock
171 taxa- Markalius inversus20 sites
- Arkhangelskiella cymbiformis15 sites
- Placozygus sigmoides13 sites
- Cribrosphaerella ehrenbergii12 sites
- Eiffellithus gorkae12 sites
- Micula staurophora12 sites
- Placozygus spiralis12 sites
- Eiffellithus turriseiffelii10 sites
- Kamptnerius magnificus10 sites
- Micula concava10 sites
- Cribrosphaerella daniae9 sites
- Cruciplacolithus primus9 sites
- Markalius apertus9 sites
- Micula cubiformis9 sites
- Micula murus9 sites
- Watznaueria barnesae9 sites
- Ahmuellerella octoradiata8 sites
- Micula decussata8 sites
- Neocrepidolithus neocrassus8 sites
- Prediscosphaera stoveri8 sites
- Reticulofenestra dictyoda8 sites
- Acuturris scotus7 sites
- Coccolithus pelagicus7 sites
- Gartnerago obliquum7 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 28 sites for Cervisiella, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
8 references- A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in the Neuquén Basin of Argentina15
- End-Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton and response to the K/Pg event in the Kawas epicontinental sea. Insights from Cerro Bombero section, Jagüel formation, Neuquén Basin13
- Paleogene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy for two boreholes in the eastern Austral Basin, Patagonia, Argentina10
- Late Maastrichtian to Danian organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts and calcareous nannofossils from eastern Austral Basin, Patagonia, Argentina9
- Nanofósiles calcáreos del Cretácico tardío - Terciario, del Pozo BB III A x-1 (Bahía Blanca), cuenca del Colorado, Argentina2
- A new elasmosaurid (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the upper levels of the La Colonia Formation (upper Maastrichtian), Chubut Province, Argentina1
- Primera ingresión atlántica en Peninsula de Valdés: Bioestratigrafía, paleoambiente y paleoclima del Daniano1
- Nanofósiles calcáreos paleógenos del sudeste de la provincia de Santa Cruz, Patagonia, Argentina1
Each of the 52 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Cervisiella was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.
iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Cervisiella firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
No 3D scan of Cervisiella was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itFormations of the PaleoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Hildebrand-Habel et al. 1999